Mainstreaming technical competences in professional projective capacity, within integration of Bachelor's and Master's degrees in Architecture training to professional itinerary

  1. Juan Diego López-Arquillo 1
  2. Cristiana Pereira Teixeira de Oliveira 1
  3. María Cadenas Borges 1
  1. 1 Universidad Europea de Canarias, España
Journal:
Advances in Building Education

ISSN: 2530-7940

Year of publication: 2023

Issue Title: Septiembre - Diciembre

Volume: 7

Issue: 3

Pages: 32-45

Type: Article

DOI: 10.20868/ABE.2023.3.5204 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Advances in Building Education

Abstract

IPBL methodology is based on a realistic approach that places students in a process in conditions similar to those they will face in a real professional assignment. From the academic year 2020-2021, the School of Architecture of the UEC is facing a series of global challenges proposed by different organisations, challenges within which different subjects from all areas of knowledge of Architecture are integrated. Integrating the multiple challenges demanded by project-based learning, the development of the complete professional competences in Architecture -those necessary to develop a basic Architectural Project and its execution- in subjects of the Bachelor's Degree in Foundations of Architecture and the Master's Degree in Architecture have been distributed through different subjects connected between the Bachelor's Degree and the Master's Degree, promoting the acquisition of professional and personal competences. The technical integration of both degrees from the professional documentary capacity of the basic and execution project has been studied by direct comparison both in time sequence of implementation, with notable improvements in technical documentary quality, self-perception and intuitive response capacity to the project.

Bibliographic References

  • Pertusa, H. (2023). La empresa humanista en la era de la complejidad. Human Review. International humanities, 17(3), 1-11. DOI: 10.37467/revhuman.v12.4734
  • Clavería, A. (2017). El arquitecto: formación, competencias y práctica profesional. ACE Architecture, city and enviroment, 12(34), 301-320. DOI: 10.5821/ace.12.34.5296
  • De la Portilla, C. (2023). Cómo vivir de la Arquitectura. Madrid: Arpa Práctica. ISBN 978-84-19662-01-9
  • Eurydice. (2021). The structure of the European education systems 2021/22: schematic diagrams, Publications Office of the European Union, 2021. Brussels: European Commission, European Education and Culture Executive Agency. DOI:10.2797/972889
  • Navarro-Astor, E., & Caven, V. (2012). Architects in Spain: A profession under risk. In 28th Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM) Conference. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Edinburgh. 577-587.
  • Arquia. (2020). VIII Encuesta a Estudiantes de Arquitectura. Madrid: Fundación Arquia.
  • López Arquillo, J.D; Oliveira, C; Cadenas Borges, M; Serrano González, J. (2023). Integración de proyectos transdisciplinares con metodología ICBL mediante la plataforma bechallenge. Actas de las XVII Jornadas de Innovación Universitaria. 147-149. ISBN: 978-84-1170-033-7.
  • González, C. (2014). Strategies on creativity in Higher Education: design thinking, game-based and project-based learning. RED, revista de educación a distancia (40), 7-22. http://hdl.handle.net/10201/46543.
  • Baeza, A. C. (2017). Proyectar es investigar. Palimpsesto, (17).
  • Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students' perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher education, 27(1), 27-52.
  • Nava, M. &. (2009). Problem based learning: an experience in teaching occupational health. Journal of the faculty of Medicine, 49(004), 146-150.
  • Correia, A., Oliveira, C., & Pereira, R. (2017). From emotions to place attachment. Co-creation and well-being in tourism, 163-177. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44108-5_13
  • Rebolledo, D., Castillo, H., & Rubí, P. (2017). Team based learning: an educational methodology facilitating student learning. Journal of Health Sciencies Education (14), 144-148.
  • Andreasen, M. M., Hansen, C. T., & Cash, P. (2015). Conceptual design. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 89-92. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-19839-2
  • Sánchez Ostiz, A. (1995). La calidad en la redacción del proyecto de arquitectura. RE. Revista de edificación (20), 7-14. DOI: 10.15581/020.20.34931
  • McClean, D., & Hourigan, N. (2013). Critical dialogue in architecture studio: Peer interaction and feedback. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 8(1), 35-57. DOI: 10.11120/jebe.2013.00004
  • Rodríguez, C., Hudson, R., & Niblock, C. (2018). Collaborative learning in architectural education: Benefits of combining conventional studio, virtual design studio and live projects. Education Technology, 49(3), 337-353. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12535
  • Smith, D., & Lilly, L. (2016). Understanding Student Perceptions of Stress in Creativity–Based Higher Education Programs: A Case Study in Interior Architecture. Journal of Interior Design, 41(2), 39-56.
  • Deutsch, R. (2020). Think Like an Architect: How to Develop Critical, Creative and Collaborative Problem-Solving Skills. RIBA Publications, 89-90.
  • Henricksen, D., Mehta, R., & Mehta, S. (2019). Design thinking gives STEAM to teaching: A framework that breaks disciplinary boundaries. Steam education: theory and practice (12), 57-78.
Data source: Dialnet